Skip to content
Lord Sterling
Philosophy

Avicenna's person without sensations

Archive 00496

Slide 1

Could you know you exist without bodily sensations?

The philosopher Avicenna asks us to imagine a person without ordinary bodily sensations. Could that person still be aware of existing?

More to Read

You ordinarily know yourself amid sensations: pressure underfoot, movement, sight and sound. Avicenna asks the reader to imagine a person for whom those ordinary routes of bodily awareness are absent, and then asks what awareness would remain.

Slide 2

Imagine a person with no ordinary bodily contact

Avicenna imagines a newly created person suspended with separated limbs. The person has no ordinary bodily contact.

More to Read

The person is imagined as newly created and suspended, with limbs separated so they do not touch. The scenario excludes the usual sensory contact through which a body becomes apparent. These are stipulated conditions in an argument, not instructions for a real procedure.

Slide 3

Avicenna proposes that self-awareness would remain

The Flying Man argument removes ordinary sensory contact. It proposes that awareness of one’s own existence would remain; this is a premise, not a measured observation.

More to Read

Remove sight of the body, contact between its parts and ordinary sensory encounters with the surroundings. Avicenna proposes that the person would nevertheless affirm their own existence. That remaining self-awareness is the crucial premise, not a measured observation.

Slide 4

Awareness of yourself differs from awareness of your body

Avicenna uses that proposed self-awareness to distinguish knowing oneself from awareness of bodily features. Whether it establishes an independent self is a further question.

More to Read

The argument uses this proposed awareness to distinguish the self from awareness of bodily features. A philosophical objection asks whether failing to be aware of a body establishes that the self is independent of one. What can be imagined and what exists are different questions.

Slide 5

The distinction leaves a premise to examine

Knowing that you exist is not identical to knowing what your body is like.

Accepting that distinction does not settle every claim about the soul or the mind’s relationship to the body.

More to Read

The Flying Man separates two questions often run together: awareness that I exist, and awareness of what my body is like. Accepting that distinction need not settle every claim about the soul, embodiment or the relationship between mind and brain.

Sources

Join Lord Sterling to explore your personal Discover feed and preserve what interests you.