Slide 1
Mozi argued for concern beyond one’s own group
Mozi and later Mohists argued for inclusive concern. They criticized forms of partiality that permit harm to outsiders for the advantage of one’s own group.
More to Read
The tradition arose in ancient China and linked ethical proposals with standards of benefit. Inclusive concern addresses how people act toward others; it should not be reduced to a demand for identical feelings toward everyone.
Slide 2
Excluding outsiders can turn partiality into conflict
Treating another family or state as expendable can generate injury and war. Mohist arguments connect small patterns of exclusion with wider disorder.
More to Read
Imagine two neighbourhoods each protecting its own water supply by contaminating the other’s. Both can end worse off. The example illustrates why a norm limited to insiders may undermine shared security.
Slide 3
Mohists tested teachings against evidence and practical benefit
Mohists assessed teachings through tests involving models, evidence and practical benefit. Their philosophy includes methods of argument as well as moral slogans.
More to Read
A claim that a custom is traditional does not alone show that it helps people. Asking about its consequences for livelihood and order gives the debate a standard that can challenge prestigious practices.
Slide 4
Their criticism of offensive war allowed defensive protection
Mohist texts condemn offensive warfare and its destructive costs. This position coexists with attention to defensive protection.
More to Read
Rejecting aggression is not the same as refusing every organized defence. The distinction matters because Mohists were also associated with defensive expertise, making a blanket description as simply anti-force misleading.
Slide 5
Inclusive concern still raises questions about family duties
Mohist concern asks how obligations extend beyond familiar relationships. Critics and defenders debate how this relates to special duties within families.
More to Read
In the water example, protecting local residents can remain important while ruling out actions that disregard neighbours' humanity. The philosophical task is to explain the balance rather than assume concern has only one possible scale.
Sources
- Mohism
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy