Skip to content
Lord Sterling
Medicine

Shared decisions connect evidence with patient priorities

Archive 01210

Slide 1

A medical choice can involve different priorities

Shared decision making combines clinical evidence with what matters to the patient. Clinicians and patients discuss reasonable options and their likely consequences.

More to Read

Two people may value the same outcomes differently, such as symptom relief, treatment burden or uncertainty. Recognizing those priorities helps explain why one option need not suit everyone with the same diagnosis.

Slide 2

Options need comparable explanations

The conversation covers benefits, harms and uncertainties of available options. Where appropriate, this includes choosing not to start an intervention now.

More to Read

Comparisons are easier to understand when risks use consistent time periods and formats. Presenting one option’s benefit and another’s harm in incompatible terms can obscure the trade-off instead of clarifying it.

Slide 3

Decision aids organize the evidence

A decision aid can explain options and help people identify their preferences. It supports the conversation between the patient and care team.

More to Read

An aid does not replace clinical interpretation or the opportunity to ask questions. Its usefulness depends on understandable, relevant information and on fitting the decision actually being faced.

Slide 4

Understanding runs in both directions

Clinicians need to understand the patient’s goals, and patients need a clear account of the choices. Questions and clarification are part of the process.

More to Read

Practical circumstances can affect whether an option is manageable in daily life. Discussing those circumstances turns an abstract comparison into a decision that reflects the person’s situation without assuming their priorities.

Slide 5

A decision can be revisited

Shared decisions include agreement about the next step and follow-up. Preferences or circumstances can change as new information becomes available.

More to Read

The process is neither a clinician dictating a choice nor a patient being left alone with a list. It distributes information and deliberation so that professional expertise and personal priorities both inform care.

Sources

Join Lord Sterling to explore your personal Discover feed and preserve what interests you.