Skip to content
Lord Sterling
History

Archaeological layers and relative time

Archive 01140

Slide 1

Undisturbed layers generally put older deposits below newer ones

Archaeological stratigraphy studies layers and their relationships.

In an undisturbed sequence, a deposit underneath another was generally laid down earlier than the material above it.

More to Read

The qualification about disturbance is essential. A site is the result of activities and natural processes rather than a perfectly stacked calendar. Archaeologists reconstruct those processes before turning depth into an argument about relative age.

Slide 2

A later pit can carry younger material deeper

A later pit can cut through earlier deposits. Material at the bottom of that pit may therefore be younger than layers beside it at a higher level.

More to Read

This example explains why depth alone is insufficient. The edge of the cut establishes a relationship: the pit could only be dug after the deposits it penetrated existed. Recording boundaries can be as informative as collecting objects from inside them.

Slide 3

A find’s recorded context supports its interpretation

An artifact’s location and relationship to other remains form its context.

Removing it without recording those relationships can destroy evidence needed to interpret its use and date.

More to Read

A cooking vessel beside a hearth supports a different set of questions from the same vessel reused in a burial. The object has not changed, but its associations have. Context allows an interpretation to extend beyond the artifact’s appearance.

Slide 4

A sequence does not automatically supply calendar dates

Stratigraphy can establish that one event came before another without giving either a calendar year. Other dating evidence can sometimes help anchor that sequence more precisely.

More to Read

A sequence of floor, destruction layer and rebuilding establishes an order even before an absolute date is available. That order can test a proposed history of a site. Exact dates add information, but the relationships remain valuable in their absence.

Slide 5

Excavation removes relationships that records must preserve

Excavation removes deposits as it studies them.

Plans, photographs, descriptions and finds records preserve relationships that cannot simply be recreated by digging the same layer again.

More to Read

Documentation allows another researcher to examine the reasoning after the physical context has changed. This makes a site archive part of the evidence, not an administrative extra. A well-recorded excavation leaves questions open to later analysis and improved methods.

Sources

Join Lord Sterling to explore your personal Discover feed and preserve what interests you.